Abbott and Costello meet Wittgenstein | Issue 25 | Philosophy Now
While reading this particular passage, I was reminded of a similar case, wherein a man insists against the face of all opposing evidence that 13 x 7 = Abbott and Costello perform the 7x13=28 routine, where Costello attempts to prove to Abbott that 7 times 13 equals 28, 28 divided by 7 equals 13, and seven. The answer is simple Abbott and Costello. he just witnessed, in the case of “ Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein” it was the .. 7 x 13 =
Bud, seeing an easy way to score a quick buck off the naive Lou, gives him a quick rundown of the rules before jumping into the game. There is just one problem.
Understand common core maths? Then prove 7x13=28 - The National
Lou, it seems, might know all about dice. Who is hustling who?
As the two just engage in casual discussion, Lou continually reels in huge fish. In the end, Lou indeed catches his prize fish, or does it catch him. Bud routinely interrupts Lou, infuriating him along the way with each interruption. In the end, Bud commits the ultimate comedic sin, causing Lou to collapse in a heap of sorrow and sadness.
Usually involving Lou and a landlord, Lou uses his charm, and wit to convince his landlord of his numerical expertise through several creative ways of using seven, and thirteen to arrive at twenty-eight.
The 10 Best Abbott and Costello Skits – The Impact
Two Tens for a Five In a skit that really utilizes the straight man skill of Bud and the comedic skill of Lou, a slightly more nefarious Bud attempts to scam his naive little buddy out of a couple extra bucks when he convinces Lou to give him two tens for a five.
Not only does Lou feel like something is fishy about the whole scenario, he somehow still owes Bud. It was located on Bagel Street. As Bud and Lou walk the streets, an unsuspecting Lou attempts to ask a people the exact location of Bagel Street.
Understand common core maths? Then prove 7x13=28
Unfortunately for Lou, every person he asks had a terrible experience on Bagel Street, and they take out their frustration on both Lou, and the hats.
The Payphone Sketch Perhaps one of their funniest sketches, the skit involves Bud demanding that Lou use the payphone to make a phone call.
The officers will get 4 doughnuts each, not Pomeroy then goes into a convoluted explication as to why this is not so. He actually proves to himself at least that 28 is the correct answer, and does so by the use of addition, division and multiplication. Of course, his use of these functions differs greatly from that of everyone else around him, yet on his own terms he is quite convincing.
He applies his own rules to the computation, and each time arrives at an answer satisfactory to him. Pomeroy could easily claim that all the old rules of mathematics hold true until we reach the equation 13 x 7, in which case his rules take over.
But, as Charles Peirce a member of the famous comedy act Peirce and James might say, what practical effect does this seeming difference in meaning have? Both the comedians and the philosopher were interested in the uses and abuses of language. Brian McGuinness, Blackwell,p. Abbott and Costello, famous for their verbal trickery and semantic manipulations, took advantage of such grammatical confusions for comic effect.
Kripke makes a further relevant point.